Getting a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry
Timetable for Progress toward the Ph.D. in the Physical Chemistry Division
First year students will be advised to take courses based on review of the student’s previous course work. Graduate students in the physical chemistry division are expected to complete 2-3 courses in each of their first two semesters of study. Formal Ph.D. course requirements in the physical chemistry division are listed in the course requirements link. First year students are also expected to meet with at least three chemistry faculty to discuss potential Ph.D. research projects. The selection of a research supervisor must be made before the end of the second semester, but students are encouraged to make this decision as early as possible. Once the decision to join a group has been made, the student is expected to initiate research activities. The summer of the first year is normally devoted to full time research.
Continue course work and research activities. According to the Graduate School requirements, students who intend to pursue a Ph.D. degree must submit a Program for Doctoral Degree form to the Graduate School by the end of the third semester, i.e, typically fall semester of the second year. The form requires the student to supply the names and signatures of Ph.D. committee members (Appendix A) and to present a list of completed and future courses that are intended to satisfy the chemistry department and Graduate School Ph.D. course requirements.
Admission to candidacy in Physical Chemistry is based upon a written and oral qualifying exam, a written research proposal, and an oral defense of the proposal.
The written portion of the qualifying exam will take place on Thursday and Friday in the week after the Spring Final exam week. The exam will consist of a total of 8 questions (4 each day), which will be based on the content of the five PChem core courses (Chem 509, 531, 532, 534, and 564). Each question will be graded by at least two PChem faculty members and assigned a score of 2 (pass), 1 (marginal pass), or 0 (fail). A total score greater than 8 will constitute a pass, a score equal to 8 a marginal pass, and less than 8 a fail. Students who obtain a full pass will automatically be allowed to go on to the oral component of the exam. In the case of a marginal pass, these students will be allowed to take the oral exam but they will be expected to show proficiency in the subjects that were incorrectly addressed in the written portion. Students who obtain a failing score on the written exam will have the opportunity to retry, but not until the following spring. The oral portions of the qualifying exam will be held on Wednesday through Friday of the following week. These will be held in front of the entire PChem faculty and will primarily focus on any deficiencies identified in the written exam. The oral exam will be graded as pass/fail. A failed oral exam may be repeated after at least 1 month has passed.
Students who successfully pass the qualifying examinations (written+oral) are expected to complete the oral preliminary examination by the end of the 2nd month of the 2nd semester after completing the qualifying exams (generally in the Fall semester of the 3rd year). The oral preliminary examination will be based on the content of the research proposal (see Appendix B) submitted by the student as part of the application to complete the oral examination. The oral examination will be conducted before the student’s Ph.D. committee in accordance with the rules set forth by the Graduate School, i.e., using the official preliminary exam scheduling form from the Graduate School giving an examination date that has been agreed to by the student and his/her Ph.D. committee. A valid program of study must have been on file with the Graduate School at least one semester prior to scheduling the oral examination. The oral examination is an opportunity for the student to express his/her potential for original creative research, for communicating his/her thoughts clearly and concisely, and for utilizing his/her background to solve problems. The oral examination will consist of a 45 minute presentation by the student based on the research proposal followed by a question and answer session by the Ph.D. committee. Student performance on the oral preliminary examination will be rated pass or fail by the Ph.D. committee. Students who pass are granted formal candidacy for the doctoral degree. Students who fail will be eligible to re-take the oral preliminary examination at a later time under conditions set forth by the Ph.D. committee in accordance with Graduate School policies. Students who fail the oral preliminary examination a second time will be placed in the M.S. degree track and will no longer be eligible for Ph.D. studies.
Fourth and Fifth Years
Students are expected to complete original research leading to a doctoral thesis in the fourth and fifth years. Doctoral dissertations are normally completed by the end of the fifth year. The research adviser and thesis committee monitor research progress during this period. A final oral defense of the thesis completes the Ph.D. requirements.
Teaching is an important mechanism for reinforcing basic knowledge and developing the communication, presentation, and interpersonal skills necessary for future success. Most students find teaching to be a rewarding and satisfying endeavor and consider it to be a valuable component of their educational experiences in the department. Accordingly, the physical chemistry division requires all graduate students to complete at least one year of teaching duties in the department.
Annual Progress Report
The Graduate School requires the department to annually evaluate the progress of graduate students toward completion of their degree requirements. The evaluation is conducted shortly after the end of the spring semester each year by the Associate Chair of the department in consultation with a student’s research advisor and teaching supervisor.
Students should submit a written statement of their progress to their research adviser by the end of the spring semester each year. Students are expected to perform well in coursework, teaching and research in order to remain in good standing in the department and the Graduate School. A grade point average of 3.0 or above is formally required to maintain good academic standing. A student’s teaching evaluations and research progress will also be considered in the annual evaluation. Students will be provided with a written evaluation of their progress each year by the department.
APPENDIX A – Selection of Ph.D. Committee
Ph.D. students are required by the Graduate School to select a Ph.D. committee by the end of their third semester and to submit the names and signatures of the committee members, along with a course program, to the Graduate School. The information should be provided on the Graduate School’s Program for Doctoral Degree form.
The current policy in the chemistry department is that the Ph.D. committee should consist of four members: the research adviser, two people from any division in the chemistry department, and a fourth person from either a division in the chemistry department other than the student’s or from an outside department who is knowledgeable in the student’s area of research.
Once a committee is selected, the student is required to provide annual written updates to each committee member of their progress toward completion of the Ph.D. course and research requirements. The progress reports should be submitted each year prior to the end of the spring semester so that they may also be used by the chemistry department in its annual evaluation of graduate students.
APPENDIX B – Research Proposal
The oral preliminary examination for formal Ph.D. candidacy will be based on a written research proposal submitted by the student not later than the beginning of the second month of the second semester after completing the cumulative examination (generally Fall of third year).
The research proposal should be based on the student’s intended Ph.D. thesis research project, but of course it is not expected to cover all aspects of the planned thesis. The style, content, format and length of the research proposal should loosely conform to current National Science Foundation guidelines. The guidelines are contained in NSF’s Grant Proposal Guide which can be obtained at http://www.nsf.gov. There is no need, however, to address the NSF broader impacts criterion and the proposal should be limited to the NSF project description section and references. In general this should be a technical document in any area of physical chemistry with significant space devoted to the fundamental theoretical and experimental principles involved in the planned research.
Specifically the research proposal should include a review of the scientific literature relevant to the proposed project, a presentation of preliminary results obtained by the student, a discussion of the proposed Ph.D. research problem and particularly its significance in the larger context, and an outline of the procedures and timeline for completing the proposed research. The content of the research proposal will be the basis of the oral preliminary examination.